Underworld wiki

[TheBang]

Yeah, the promos came out first, but the proper single release was in that order, so that's how it should go, IMO.

As for Kittens, there are certain guidelines for articles on Wikipedia. One of those is notability:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:Notability

It will not pass that criteria. That's the same reason the Confusion article was deleted.

I've become increasingly frustrated over the last year by the constraints of Wikipedia. It is simply not an appropriate venue for all the Underworld trivia that we want to put down.

[negative1]

Originally Posted by TheBang

Yeah, the promos came out first, but the proper single release was in that order, so that's how it should go, IMO.

As for Kittens, there are certain guidelines for articles on Wikipedia. One of those is notability:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:Notability

It will not pass that criteria. That's the same reason the Confusion article was deleted.

I've become increasingly frustrated over the last year by the constraints of Wikipedia. It is simply not an appropriate venue for all the Underworld trivia that we want to put down.

kittens was a digital release (a free one), but wouldn't that
count, just like itunes releases? its also notable as being the
first one for the group, preceding 'riverun' etc..


yeah, i know, we need another page for the non-standard releases,
why are some promos ok (juanita), and others aren't? (dirty, rowla, etc)..

later
-1

[Dirty0900]

Kittens was a free download and done way before the whole Napster issue blew up.