Now playing on dirty.radio: Loading... |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Chemical Brothers - Further
Well that could very well be the case Eikman, I don't see it as much different from stuff like "Crank That", kinda a fun tune, not exactly good or worth listening to over and over, but I wouldn't hate on the group because of it. I don't know why they released it as a single any more than you do. It's not like WATN didn't have its share of longer and heavier tracks to balance that out. I thought some of it was very good.
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Chemical Brothers - Further
[QUOTE=34958hq439-qjw9v5jq298v5jI thought some of it was very good.[/QUOTE]
i've forgotten just about every note. some notes i've forced from my memory; but most of it just went in and out straight away. much like 'ahdo' for me...* *in terms of impact, not sound. obviously.
__________________
uw0761 nutts2020 |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Chemical Brothers - Further
I can't stand that track. I can't believe it was created by anyone, let alone the Chemical Brothers.
|
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Chemical Brothers - Further
__________________
Romans 6:4 |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Chemical Brothers - Further
I would at least give "Burst Generator" another listen...
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Chemical Brothers - Further
Cool video - song was ok, liked it when it got a bit more chilled for a few bars ~2 min in. The main synth lead with the pitchslide is, as someone on youtube noted, very Orbital-esque. But in true Chems fashion, they tweak the high frequencies, here to an almost painful degree. I'm hoping the full-length version is a bit more interesting and varied.
__________________
Believe in Billy Records |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Chemical Brothers - Further
Quote:
|
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Chemical Brothers - Further
Here's a link to (128kbps) mp3 of Swoon:
>>>Click<<<
__________________
Romans 6:4 |
Post Reply |
|
|