Now playing on dirty.radio: Loading... |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does anyone here use Reaktor 5?
Quote:
Since you've only had your copy for a couple of weeks let's make it a point to bounce stuff off of each other, if that's cool. Also, am I really missing out with not having Ableton? That's all I hear people talk about; I know that Cubase is friendly with midi and the sound engine is about as good as it gets but would I be better off trying out Ableton before I really commit to it? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does anyone here use Reaktor 5?
well, one thing to consider is that I actually record and mix into protools. i don't use Live for my end result...I use it for sketching and for live performance. But, everything you can do with a sampler, you can do with live--maybe in a different or nonconventional way, but Live will do it. if you intend to have a "be-all" recording platform, I can't honestly say that I use Live for that purpose.
__________________
www.soundcloud.com/marshall_watson |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does anyone here use Reaktor 5?
I haven't used Protools in a long time, and I miss it quite a bit. There is a reason why it is (was?) the professional platform of choice.
I never cared for Cubase, myself, but I haven't looked at it in several generations, either. Live offers some neat possibilities, but doesn't offer the depth of MIDI editing that Cubase does...not even close. Download the demo, and give it a try. You may find you like it, you may not; it really depends on the way you work. (I swear by Live, myself, but I'm not doing complex MIDI work, either.)
__________________
everybody makes mistakes...but i feel alright when i come undone |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does anyone here use Reaktor 5?
Well talking to other techeads out there, their feeling on recording software is that Protools rules largely off of the fact that it was the first, best and only digital recording workhorse for a long time. Protools still has the best plugins available but its midi support is only marginal. I did a lot of qualification before investing my money into Cubase and the concensus seemed to be that although Protools does still have that incredible 3rd party support that I wouldn't really be taking a step backwards with sound quality if I went with Cubase. So far I agree, the rudimentary stuff I've done in it has all come out leaps and bounds better than my days tinkering with Acid 4.0...
My only reason for wanting stellar MIDI support is because when you couple Reason and Cubase and Reason is ran like a plugin that the sound quality is much better than if you were just exporting your mix out of the stand-alone program. That's been somewhat negated with R3.0's M-Class modules, but not completely. And I do a lot of live recording work too so, perfect fit. Speaking of plugins, it seems like I've nailed a good bet with Reaktor 5's VST software but, does anyone else have any rec's for VST software? How are those Virus modules? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does anyone here use Reaktor 5?
Well, I haven't used their software at all, but both Prof and I own Virus hardware synths, so I'd say it's worth looking into.
If you're looking for effects, I'd recommend anything and everything by PSP. Processor inefficient on my mac, but I think people were getting better performance out of them on PC. They have trial demos, so you can't lose. For soft synths, my next acquisition will be Absynth. You can hear samples of that on Native Instruments' site.
__________________
everybody makes mistakes...but i feel alright when i come undone |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does anyone here use Reaktor 5?
Hey guys,
I'm a "drooling gear head" too - I think professor's processor issues will be mostly to do with using a G4 - an old processor now, unfortunately. Future, your mileage will be a lot better with that beast PC you've got - if you're interested in a very nice, resource friendly sequencer / host (works a lot like reason does, with multiple inputs/outputs on modules, envelopes, piano roll etc..) have a look at energyXT - truly one of the most progressive hosts around, and under a meg total size. Burning fast! It comes in three versions too, standalone host, vst instrument and vst effect, so you can load it inside itself, if you see what I mean, and other hosts. Its dirt cheap too! www.xt-hq.com Regarding learning the basics of synth design in reaktor, you could do worse than have a look for an old copy of NI's first app (I think?), generator. It was like a prototype for reaktor, and came with a really nice tutorial for building a synth from scratch. Pretty old now tho.. still possible to get good solid sounds from it though. Got any mp3 online? Or ogg, if you're up to speed with that. What's the big thing with Reaktor 5? I'm still using version 3. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does anyone here use Reaktor 5?
the "big" thing with Reaktor 5 is apparantly, the ability to work on the sounds at the core level. you can start from absolute scratch. so far, i haven't gone to "absolute scratch" just yet. the ensembles they provide have some powerful sounds....and easily tweeked for personalization. i like it because the thing sounds really good. the juno emulator is just stunning.
__________________
www.soundcloud.com/marshall_watson |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does anyone here use Reaktor 5?
yea - I love the way the Juno sounds... EXACTLY like the actual synth in itself. When I took my course on electronic & computer music, we basically spent the first 2/3 months just working with the Juno and a CS15
and about crashing - yea it's a total bitch, I definitely will need to get a G5 for the program... but one thing that does seem to help is to get one ensemble, go through some of the given patches, tweek from there (which can take hours... not that it's hard - but time just seems to fly) and once you've got everything set up; play what you want, then commit that to audio -> so you wouldn't need that patch anymore (but of course, save the patch if you want to back to it again) & make sure whatever new ensemble you use, don't have it commited to the same location (for playback) as that first ensemble if that doesn't make any sense... well... I mean I'm not saying I necessarily know exactly what I'm talking about Quote:
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does anyone here use Reaktor 5?
yeah, i know what you mean. that's exactly what I do, actually....i get a patch...record a midi track of me noodling with it....play with the midi track, and then when i'm happy with it, bounce it to an audio track in live....keep the midi file...save the patch...go on to next patch with same midi file....or not...
you can't run it like a multitimbral synth. well, I can't. not on my machine. but i stress again...damn. IT SOUNDS SO GOOD! and it forces one to concentrate on one sound at a time.
__________________
www.soundcloud.com/marshall_watson |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does anyone here use Reaktor 5?
Quote:
I hate not being able to save projects in Live lite |
Post Reply |
|
|