[new tracks] -> _unreleased_dubnobasswithmyheadman_era_

[BrotherLovesDub]

yannick put it there

[BrotherLovesDub]

Originally Posted by mondokat

Makes the album just sound strange.

IT'S NOT AN ALBUM. IT IS A COLLECTION OF TRACKS. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE. PLEASE MAKE A NOTE OF IT.

[negative1]

Originally Posted by holden

Listening to these on the drive and in the office... i made up a little fanboy fake cover art for this collection, basically reversing the Dubno front artwork and going nuts with text a la Tomato circa 1993-94 on the back.

'course, it doesn't fit on one 80 min CD, unless you can hande 3+ minutes of overburn

Anyway, for what it's worth, a lo-res sample. For those who like tangibility. If there's any interest i'll put it on the tracker.

cheers,
holden

i have now put the PDF for this cover on the tracker..

thanks again to holden.

later
-1

[negative1]

Originally Posted by BrotherLovesDub

yannick put it there

cats out of the bag..

later
-1

[negative1]

i've been updating the underworld 'dubnobasswithmyheadman' page
over at wikipedia to reflect all this information..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubnoba...#Track_listing

later
-1

[BrotherLovesDub]

Originally Posted by negative1

i've been updating the underworld 'dubnobasswithmyheadman' page
over at wikipedia to reflect all this information..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubnoba...#Track_listing

later
-1

i seriously disagree with your assumption on the wiki that the tracks on the DAT are an alternate or prototype running order for dubnobass. there's nothing to suggest that. simply sticking tracks on a DAT to try to get a deal does not equal sequencing tracks for an album.

[crazysugarboy]

My pc doesn't recognise the torrent file

[negative1]

Originally Posted by BrotherLovesDub

i seriously disagree with your assumption on the wiki that the tracks on the DAT are an alternate or prototype running order for dubnobass. there's nothing to suggest that. simply sticking tracks on a DAT to try to get a deal does not equal sequencing tracks for an album.

i agree,

whats a better suggestion, that i should change it to?

i've added more wording to reflect a more accurate assessment of what
it might have been..

alternately feel free to change it to reflect that.

later
-1

[Vectorman0]

Unfortunately, I think the problem is that it isn't "notable enough" for wikipedia. The dubno page may be the best place for it (because it would be deleted if it had it's own page), but I don't think this info should be placed next to the dubno information.

While we are on the subject of Wikipedia, does anyone have the know-how to set up a dedicated UW wiki? I now noticed many of the old UW singles pages have been deleted. They had info on them I considered very valuable. Certainly we could make a much better wiki with more info on it.

[gambit]

Originally Posted by joethelion

so I just tracked down my copy of the "MK1 Demo Tape" and what did I find... "Feel Me" but it's a 4 minute version, not 4:25
which makes me wonder -> MMMMMAAAAYYYYBBBEEE the older, previously known MK1 demo tape is from a bit closer to the creation of "Dubno" than we thought. Or at least, closer than what I originally thought...? any ideas?

It sounded familiar to me as well, and yeah, "Feel Me" was a MK1 demo, and so was M.E.