![]() |
Re: Hard Candy
Usually if someone whose opinion I might value (pretty much anybody on this board) is speechless ("Wow........") from a movie - I'd be keen to check it out too.
|
Re: Hard Candy
Quote:
As Stimpee has said, there is such a thing as netiquette. If people start posting in ALL CAPS ALL THE TIME, AM I NOT ALLOWED TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT IT?? Quote:
Quote:
The :D kind of gives it away if you ask me. To me it seemed that Lukes comments about "why not make it the BOARD RULES (in bold and in CAPS no less)" were at least deliberately inflammatory. Again, the only person who was mentioning RULES was Luke himself. btw it's funny how you don't seem to take something like Tom's post in the stickie spoiler thread: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
second, I would say it was mostly coinscidence rather than a critical situation. Coinscidence that I happened to click on this thread, happened to find only the word "wow" and happened to feel like that was a bit limited. So I made a comment (granted, with a bit of sarcasm, pehaps I should have used a ;)), then later explained myself in more detail after Janie pointed me to IMDB. It's not like I go trough the forums pointing out what problems I have with people's posts, because on the whole I don't really have a lot of problems with posts here. |
Re: Hard Candy
Please get back on topic.
|
Re: Hard Candy
Quote:
|
Re: Hard Candy
Quote:
|
Re: Hard Candy
Back on topic:
When Hard Candy was playing at this brew pub cinema I work at these two women were freaked out by the film and spent the last hour or so of the taking turns going back into the film to see what was happening next. They said it was too intense to sit in, but easier to stand in the back of the auditorium, a pint clutched in their hands, close to the exit when things got too intense for them, or when they needed a refill, which was often. |
Re: Hard Candy
Quote:
Think I will watch this from the safety of my sofa in that case. :D |
Re: Hard Candy
You're largely right, KoS, but I think you're missing my point in certain respects. 1) Yes, apparently I misinterpreted Stimpee's post about locking the thread. That just indicates that his meaning isn't as clear as he thinks, which was a point I was trying to make. Also, even if he's %100 joking, for the joke to make any sense, it's implied that he thinks joke/nonsense threads merit locking. Not a big deal, my misinterpretation, but I think it illustrates that he has to be cautious about his moderation/non-moderation posting. Especially since he is establishing a pattern of criticizing people's posting habits sincerely.
2) You're right about the caps. I would fully endorse giving people shit about that. There are plenty of other posts, too, that I'd like to give people shit about, too, so I definitely think some criticism is warranted. I guess I thought your tone was harsher than the infringement warranted, but, again, granted, I may have totally misread your tone. 3) I interpret Tom's posts differently, true. That's because I know Tom a fair bit better, and am better able to interpret his tone. Sorry for all the fuss...I didn't mean to bend everybody out of shape. You're all a bunch of cunts. |
Re: Hard Candy
Everyone here with any sense will gladly take that as a compliment.
CUNTS UNITE! (and nevermind the bollocks) |
Re: Hard Candy
We're all cunts. Which is good. Adam is the biggest one ever - perhaps that's why I love him so.
p.s. if people start using ;) more I'll shoot them for being like the mongoose. that in itself is a criminal offence. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.